NOT KNOWN FACTUAL STATEMENTS ABOUT HOW CASES ARE HANDLED THAT ARE NOT MENTIONED IN LAW

Not known Factual Statements About how cases are handled that are not mentioned in law

Not known Factual Statements About how cases are handled that are not mentioned in law

Blog Article

“There isn't any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any on the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after a ways they noticed the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't suggest that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These types of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of final witnessed.

Its enforcement with the provision of capital punishment or life imprisonment underscores the value of human life as well as importance of maintaining legislation and order in society.

Case files may also be accessed from the public access terminals within the clerk’s office of your court where the case was filed. 

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Specified the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been with the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle isn't legally seem, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really issue to rules and regulations Should the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case in the petitioners for promotion could be regarded as, however, we are clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, subject to availability of vacancy subject matter to your approval in the competent authority.

R.O, Office, Gujranwala plus the police officials did not inform him that the identification parade of the accused hasn't been conducted nonetheless. In the moment case, now the accused attempted to consider advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the image of the petitioner was broadly circulated. The police should not have exposed the identity with the accused through electronic media. The regulation lends assurance to your accused that the identity should not be exposed to the witnesses, particularly to the witness to determine the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer put a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and generated shots. Aside from, the images shown within the media reveal that a mask wasn't placed over the accused to cover his identity right until he was put up for an identification parade. Making photographs in the accused publically, either by showing the same on the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or application, would create doubt inside the proceedings on the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to guarantee that there is no likelihood for your witness to see the accused before going on the identification parade. The accused should not be shown to your witness in person or through any other manner, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or maybe the press or electronic media. Supplied the reasons elaborated higher than, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

 Petitioner acquiring been declared an absconder in this case for over 1 plus a 50 % year generates the apprehension that the petitioner might avoid standing trial and that's why delay the prosecution of your case. The material on record makes the case on the petitioner falls under two exceptions for the rule of grant of bail as mentioned above.

whether though granting promotion senior employees were thought of for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)

The prosecution presented substantial evidence, together with eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature with the seized currency.

If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability inside the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request to the appellate court.

The scrupulous reader might have noticed a thing previously mentioned: a flaw. Past the check here first seven words, the definition focuses about the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The two basic elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of a crime are “

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

share or interest of the co-owner in immovable property could also sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or perhaps to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)

P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to observe that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are absolutely different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case regulation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held with the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--

Report this page